Breakdowning a little bit of wizardous Sedinery versus the Sharks

Canucks fans have long indicated that, in lieu of a winning team, they’ll take a team that loses excitingly, which is likely why no one was too torn up over the Canucks’ 6-2 loss to the San Jose Sharks on Tuesday night. Granted, a win would have been vastly preferable, but the game was full if wizardous Sedinery, which is another kind of win in its own right.

The twins’ finest moment was undoubtedly their second goal, a piece of twinning so mind-bending it briefly brought us back to 2010-11, when they were doing stuff like this on what seemed like a nightly basis. Sure, two minutes later, the Sharks would restore their two-goal lead and all but end the game, but nobody much minded. We were still basking in the glow of this high-level Sedin magic.

Let us continue to bask as we break it down.

As we noted just the other day with our keen observations skills, Chris Higgins has been doing some under-the-radar playmaking this season, and that holds true in this sequence. Who’s talking about his bank pass to himself that kicks off this sequence?

The Sharks have the Canucks well-defended at this point. They’re playing a very well-structured zone, with four players creating a box on the outside and Couture pressuring Higgins inside if he even dares turn towards the net. There’s no shot, and there’s no danger.

Plus, it’s clear what’s about to happen. With Henrik and Higgins heading towards the same spot, we’re about to witness a handoff. The Sharks have done this drill before.

Except no! Higgins puts the puck through Henrik Sedin’s skates and off the wall to himself. It buys him just enough time to retrieve the puck and turn down the wall. For what is he turning down, as Li’L Jon has been known to remark? Daniel Sedin, who’s now behind the goal.

What’s more: Daniel’s man is Brent Burns, who’s been on the ice for over a minute and is exhausted. In the above screengrab, you’ll note that he’s asleep on his feet. If you look closely, you can see tiny zeds floating up from his forehead.

Higgins moves the puck around to Daniel, then he goes to the net hard, using his super-muscular core to force Couture into the crease alongside him.

Meanwhile, Brent Burns remembers that he’s supposed to do something and goes around the side of the net after Daniel. The problem here is that Higgins has cleared out a lane on the other side, meaning Daniel can come out over there.

So he does.

Meanwhile, Henrik slides down into the slot, creating a problem for Mirco Mueller. If he commits to cutting off Daniel’s lane across the goalmouth, he’ll leave Henrik open for a one-timer. But if he heads towards Henrik’s lane, Daniel can come across. He tries to place himself somewhere that will allow him to complicate both plays.

But the Sedins have dolphin-talked to one another already, and come up with a super-cool third option.

As they converge, Daniel holds, then swivels, as though he’s going to try a hoper shot on Antti Niemi. No doubt the aim is a low shot that, if lucky, will rebound right to Henrik.

Except no!

Instead of shooting, Daniel turns and threads a pass around both Mueller and Burns, and onto his brother’s stick. It fools everybody. Niemi, Mueller and Burns thought it was a shot. Only Henrik seemed to know there was a pass coming.

Mueller is in the process of figuring it out in the screenshot below, but it’s a split-second too late. The little black blur behind Henrik’s left calf? That’s the puck. This one’s over.

Henrik bobbles the puck, but with Niemi down and out, all he has to do is direct it towards the net. That he can do.

And that, friends, is how your Sedinery is made.

7 comments

  1. Shade of Blue
    March 5, 2015

    My wife, who was in the other room, thought perhaps the Canucks had won, or at the very least taken the lead, based on the “Yessssss!” I was unable to suppress when Henrik tapped the puck in. (I try not to react loudly to the goals and other shenanigans now that I watch the games while the kids are sleeping.) Thanks for yet another breakdowning; I always enjoy them.

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +10 (from 16 votes)
    • Chris the Curmudgeon
      March 5, 2015

      My wife also commented on my loud and excited reaction to that goal. She was less impressed by the burst of rapid fire cursing that accompanied the Sharks’ tally 2 minutes later. As I get the Comcast feeds for these Sharks games, my anger level is always a little high over having to listen to the insufferable homers they have doing colour in lieu of the lovable and pro-Canuck John Garrett on Rogers Sportsnet (admittedly, Jamie Baker is very slightly more tolerable than Drew Remenda was. Very very slightly).

      VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
      Rating: +8 (from 10 votes)
      • Joe Mama
        March 5, 2015

        I was on the phone with my girlfriend when that goal was scored.
        She said she wasn’t watching the game, but asked if the Canucks had won, right at that moment.

        I’m beginning to think she’s married…

        VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
        Rating: +8 (from 8 votes)
  2. Chinook
    March 5, 2015

    How about a breakdown of Daniel Sedin’s turnover that directly resulted in San Jose’s fourth goal? For artistic balance – like Rembrandt vs Salvador Dali.

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: -5 (from 13 votes)
    • taco
      March 5, 2015

      Yes, this breakingdown was ill timed.

      The Sedinery was excellent of course but I am starting to thing we need a word for the opposite effect. SeDohery maybe alla Homor Simpson. I noticed that they failed to include any of the miked up Hendric audio of the point just after he have up that puck. I’m sure we would have hear at least a ‘Doh’, if not more.

      It’s hard to say one guy lost us this game, and especially hard when he was the only one scoring goals, but It’s a different game if Hank just moves his feet a little faster down there. With their four balanced lines I am starting to see times in games where the Canucks are beginning to roll over teams with waves of pressure. It happened during the second period with the Blues and was starting to ramp up against the Sharks as well. The young guys seem to ride on emotion and momentum and that goal basically put an end to that.

      Here’s to drowning the dessert dogs tonight.

      Anyway, this is not the first time the Swedish meatball delivery truck has made an appearance and rolled a nice fat juicy one to the other team.

      VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
      Rating: -3 (from 7 votes)
  3. Ignorant Brit
    March 6, 2015

    Lovely stuff – both the sedinery and the breakdowning. I’ve missed both.

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +3 (from 3 votes)
  4. Lyg
    March 7, 2015

    There doesn’t seem to be video in this otherwise great breakdowning. (Luckily, I’d already watched the clip on Canucks.com about 8 times, so I could follow anyway…)

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)