I Watched This Game: Canucks at Phoenix Coyotes, February 28, 2012

For the second time in as many weeks, the Canucks faced a fellow Western Conference division leader, though this meeting was a little less hyped than the previous one. Last week, the Canucks visited the leaders of the Central Division, the Detroit Red Wings, in a game that was everything a fan could ask for in terms of entertainment. This week, they faced the Pacific Division leading Phoenix Coyotes. The Coyotes are like a magic trick with just a pledge and a turn: no prestige.

That said, the Coyotes entered the game as the hottest team in the league, with a 10-0-1 record in their last 11, making them a tough test for the road-weary Canucks. There was also the intrigue of seeing the newly acquired Sami Pahlsson and Zack Kassian wear the Scowling Orca for the first time. I watched this game.

Canucks 1 – 2 Coyotes (SO)

  • The newest members of the Canucks had thematically appropriate first ever shifts. After Kevin Bieksa took a high-sticking penalty a minute into the game, Sami Pahlsson took his first Canucks shift on the penalty kill, while Zack Kassian came out with the Sedins in place of the penalty-killing Alex Burrows as soon as the penalty ended. It was like teaching your child how to swim by pushing them into the deep end.
  • Sami “Robert” Pahlsson had a respectable debut, as Alain Vigneault used him in exactly the role we expected him to: 5 of Pahlsson’s 8 faceoff attempts were in the defensive zone, he played 1:58 on the penalty kill, and he logged 2 hits and a takeaway. What was unexpected is that he had 3 shots on goal. I had heard he was less offensive than Mr. Dressup, but he showed that he knows his way around the net.
  • The main event for Canucks fans, however, was Zack “Kass Effect” Kassian, who demonstrated many of the skills that make him a high-end prospect. He started on the 4th line and showed he can play a grinder’s game, throwing 5 hits and jawing with enforcer and Twitter deity Paul “BizNasty” Bissonnette. By the end of the second period, however, he had created a great scoring chance on a give-and-go with Henrik Sedin and had been promoted to the second line. He did not look the least bit out of place, but you know who did? Coyotes fans. They appeared to be drastically outnumbered by Canucks fans in their own building.
  • While I liked Zack “Kick-Ass” Kassian’s game, I didn’t like his headgear: Zack “Kassias Clay” Kassian kept the chin strap of his helmet looser than a 12-year-old’s spelling of “loser.” He also doesn’t wear a visor or a mouth guard, displaying his missing tooth proudly and inviting the disappearance of more of them. You worry me, Zack “Flak Jacket” Kassian.
  • Can you tell that we can’t decide on a nickname for Zack “Kasmanian Devil” Kassian?
  • Mason Raymond was all over the ice in this game, in more ways than one. had a superb game and was credited with 4 shots, 1 hit and 2 takeaways and was especially noticeable in the first period. With Hodgson gone, Raymond took over the second unit powerplay, turning it into a dizzying cycle game with David Booth and Alex Burrows. All that cycling with the puck may have made Raymond dizzy, however, as he seemed to have balance issues all game. Still, it wasn’t a coincidence that when Vigneault promoted Zack “Acid Bath” Kassian, Booth was the one that got demoted.
  • Poor Chris Tanev almost didn’t get to play in this game. He was announced as a healthy scratch in the arena, leading to a long discussion between the referees and coaches about the official lineup card. He was clearly furious, as his expression changed from a completely calm, blank face to a completely calm, blank face with slightly more squinty eyes. That outrage and anger showed up on the ice as he took the first penalty of his NHL career as he savagely got his stick tangled up in the feet of Shane Doan.
  • Considering Dave Tippett and Alain Vigneault were the two coaches of record in this game, it was shockingly wide open and physical. There were a total of 75 shots, with many of them being quality scoring chances, and 79 hits were recorded. Kevin Bieksa led the hit parade for the Canucks, while Martin Hanzal and Shane Doan led the Coyotes, with all three players recording 7 hits. So much was happening on the ice that John Garrett barely had time to talk about food.
  • Despite the high shot totals, goals were at a premium. While on the powerplay, Alex Edler scored the opening goal by banking a wrist shot off two Coyotes penalty killers from the boards. Evidently, Edler is deaf, dumb, and blind and has a supple wrist.
  • It’s nice to know that Raffi Torres hasn’t changed at all, as he bowled over Sami Salo during a scrum in front of the net like Salo was a bowling pin.
  • It’s hard to complain about Cory Schneider in a game where he made 39 saves and ensured that the Canucks got a single point, but his rebound control was uncharacteristically shoddy. His positioning was impeccable, as the vast majority of his saves were made by the crest of his jersey, but he was spitting pucks into the slot all game. One of those rebounds was pounced on by Ray Whitney, who shoveled the puck five-hole to tie the game. I won’t blame the goal on Schneider, however. I’ll blame it on every single person who even thought the word “shutout” at any point during this game. IT’S ALL YOUR FAULT.
  • Really, both goaltenders were absolutely fantastic. Mike Smith handles the puck like Marty Turco (and benefits from Dave Tippett’s system like Marty Turco), but seems to be far more sound positionally than Turco ever was. This game was extremely reminiscent of the Canucks’ playoff series against the Dallas Stars in 2007, when Turco posted 3 shutouts in the 7-game series and still lost.
  • Every single time the Canucks go to overtime, Sportsnet shows the same highlight package of the Canucks’ overtime winners this season. This means I’ve seen it approximately a bajillion times. The Canucks either need to wrap more games up in regulation or Sportsnet needs to get more creative. How about a dramatic reenactment of an overtime game-winning goal using finger puppets? Stop-motion animation? Shadow art? A flip book?
  • The Canucks did their best to add another goal to the highlight reel, outshooting the Coyotes 5-0 in overtime, but Daniel was robbed by Mike Smith and Kevin Bieksa hit the post on a late foray up the ice. Mason Raymond was once again effective in overtime, gaining the zone with aplomb and helping set up Aaron Rome for a blazing one-timer. Yes, I put “Aaron Rome” and “blazing one-timer” together in one sentence. No, I do not have a gun to my head.
  • It wasn’t long ago that Canucks fans (and some media members) were suggesting that Alain Vigneault put Cory Schneider in for Roberto Luongo in games that go to the shootout, but he didn’t have the answer in this game, stopping just one of Phoenix’s three shooters. It didn’t help that Edler’s patented shift-slightly-to-the-left-and-shoot move didn’t work as well as it normally does and that Raymond executed his spin-o-rama with all the grace of a tug boat.
Tags: , , , , , , ,

61 comments

  1. stathead
    February 29, 2012

    Tug boat. Ha ha!

    I was heading home and caught first ten minutes of the game only on the radio. Pictures of angry Tanev? Blank, mild, angry Tanev?

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +9 (from 9 votes)
  2. Melissa
    February 29, 2012

    my nickname-vote is for zack “kasmanian devil” kassian. classic.

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +15 (from 15 votes)
    • Brosef Stalin
      February 29, 2012

      Kassassain seems to be pretty popular among a certain other unnamed blog. For PITB originality i’d be down with Kasmanian devil though

      VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
      Rating: +17 (from 17 votes)
      • Nee
        February 29, 2012

        I like Kassassin.

        The other I heard was Kraken. (Release the Kraken!)

        VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
        Rating: +10 (from 10 votes)
        • rvtBC
          February 29, 2012

          “Kracken” is good and something that his teammates can easily shout out on the ice.

          VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
          Rating: +3 (from 3 votes)
      • Brent
        February 29, 2012

        What the other blog? What am I missing?

        VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  3. D to the W
    February 29, 2012

    Zack “Attack” Kassian.

    Zack Attackian.

    Zack Attackassian.

    You’re welcome.

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +5 (from 9 votes)
    • Zach Morris
      February 29, 2012

      “Cul-de-Zack” Kassian
      “Prozack” Kassian
      NotCodyHodgson
      from CDC “Centorion Maximus Galactimus Ultinium Destryimus”
      “Kassmoney”

      VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
      Rating: +5 (from 5 votes)
      • bergberg
        February 29, 2012

        Ooooooh! I like “Kassmoney”! It’s related to Steeeve’s suggestion below of Zack “Money in the bank” Kassian. And I also like to yell “Cash Money” at any time when it is even sort of appropriate, so “Kassmoney” would be good fun for me.

        VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  4. Beninvictoria
    February 29, 2012

    Zack “You Don’t Know Jack” Kassian

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +4 (from 4 votes)
  5. Josh D.
    February 29, 2012

    I’m fond of Kick-Ass Kassian.

    And the fact that not a single egg pun survived the TD livechat.

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  6. jenny wren
    February 29, 2012

    The new guy with the missing tooth
    Is not as cute as David Booth
    Although he seems at least as good
    Just as our GM thought he would

    And Paulson too more than alright
    Against the Dogs on Tuesday night
    A Gillis steal for fourth round picks
    Is our new number twenty-six

    Yes Cody’s gone but let’s not fuss
    There’re lots of guys once played for us
    Just in this game no less than three
    Whose lives go on you will agree

    So while we lost]I’ve this to say
    The deadline trades do look okay

    Chicken Chick

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +34 (from 34 votes)
  7. jox
    February 29, 2012

    ‘Krash’? ‘Kossak’?

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  8. James W.
    February 29, 2012

    Zack “Morris” Kassian?
    Zack “95.3″ Kassian?
    Zack “Mama” Kassian?

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +3 (from 3 votes)
  9. mac n cheese
    February 29, 2012

    Great recap, as always. But I’m pretty sure you just insulted tugboats.

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +19 (from 19 votes)
  10. Cathylu
    February 29, 2012

    I was at the game and yes there were a ton of Canuck fans there. My husband said we didn’t even need the anthem singer for “O Canada”; EVERYONE in the stands was singing it. I thought the new guys did pretty well. And Cory was so good – it’s too bad Smith was even better.

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +10 (from 10 votes)
    • peanutflower
      February 29, 2012

      The Canuck fans in AZ look like they enjoy themselves more than any Canuck fans anywhere. It’s like Canuck Halloween there.

      VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
      Rating: +19 (from 19 votes)
  11. Steeeve
    February 29, 2012

    I submit Zack “Caisse” Kassian. Caisse means bank, money deposit box, etc in french. The banks here in Quebec are called a caisse (pron. kass). Ie. Zack “money in the bank” Kassian.

    Hmm, on second thought, lets give this one some time to prove itself.

    In the meantime, Im all for James’ suggestion of Zack “Mama” Kassian.

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +3 (from 3 votes)
  12. peanutflower
    February 29, 2012

    Tugboat. Haha. I hate that spinarama gimmick. Give me Burrows’ money shot every time. This would have been a hard game for the Canucks to win, given the roll that Phoenix is on, and when you add two new players into the mix I’m betting it makes it harder. I thought Kassian acquitted himself very well. He didn’t look out of place, he kept up to the play, made some really nice passes. I’m not sure Lapierre will relinquish the chief yappy title, though. That’s what makes him tick. Kassian looked like he had mucho ants in his pants before the game started. Nervous just a little? Seriously, Schneider, stay in your freaking net. Just do it. Or go take summer puck handling classes from Turko. There is no need to have you whaling away with your stick behind the net. You’re way better when you’re in front of it.

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +12 (from 12 votes)
  13. yobbei
    February 29, 2012

    I thought Kassian the Assassin took some draws last night? How did he do at the faceoff circle?

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  14. jackpotpunk
    February 29, 2012

    Great “Who” reference!

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +5 (from 5 votes)
  15. Hips
    February 29, 2012

    i thought zack attack was very good, much better than i thought he would be. could have easily had two goals and an assist if mike smith hadnt been so damn good.

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +8 (from 8 votes)
  16. JDM
    February 29, 2012

    “Kass Effect” is a pretty awesome nerd joke nickname. In all honesty let’s see if he can stick with the big club before we start giving the kid nicknames.

    I was somewhat surprised that I had no issue with his skating yesterday. Kassian’s not Raymond but he doesn’t lag, per se, either. He seems to float a bit in the D zone but never made any errors that were glaring to me.

    As for the rest of his game, I do see what Sabres fans complained about in terms of not using his size to his full advantage. He seems hesitant to follow through on his hits. Possibly because he’s got Shanahan on the brain, but it seems more likely he doesn’t want to get caught out of position. When the puck is gone it seems like he’s all about the soft bump while looking back towards the play. Dude needs to finish those checks hard.

    He is much more decisive in his playmaking. He made a handful of excellent passes – the setup to Hamhuis particularly stands out – and they weren’t feather passes, they were bullets. He attempted a reverse out from behind the net to Raymond in the third, which was blocked (as the Coyotes are wont to do) but it was pretty close to a nice tap in setup as Smith was clearly going the wrong way.

    Jury still out. Still hate the trade until they come back with a positive verdict. Hope Kassian stays on the 2nd line, though, because Kesler was strong like bull yesterday and it sets a good example for how Kassian should play. If they can get him to be as big a jerk as Kesler on the forecheck he will flatten people.

    However, this leads to some confusion as to the other 3 lines. The first is set. But if Kassian’s on the 2nd line, we effectively have either a world-beating checking line in Pahlsson / Malhotra / Lapierre (the all-centre line) or two lines that seem sort of split between checking and offense. Booth really doesn’t fit on line 4. I would much rather see Higgins / Pahlsson / Booth or even Higgins / Lapierre / Booth for line 3.

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +5 (from 5 votes)
    • JDM
      February 29, 2012

      I should add, there were a handful of occasions where Kassian had real trouble controlling the puck and let it get away from him. I don’t know to what extent they can work on that with him but if he’s going to be a board player, being able to protect the puck is obviously kind of important to that style.

      VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
      Rating: -2 (from 2 votes)
    • bergberg
      February 29, 2012

      You are pretty tough on the kid! But I do understand that you are still upset about losing Cody, that will sting for all of us for a while. Don’t forget that he’s only 21. The Canucks have loads of time to work with him and develop him into the player they want him to be. I didn’t see most of the game last night, but by all accounts (including yours) it sounds like the potential is definitely there. It was only his first game with the Canucks, so to hear he had some chances and meshed with some of the core guys is also promising. Gillis called him an “NHLer” so I’m pretty confident he’s going to be sticking it out with the big club.

      If Kassian turns out to be a great fit with the Canucks, will you change your mind on the trade?

      VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
      Rating: +4 (from 4 votes)
      • JDM
        February 29, 2012

        I’m not “tough” on him. He did some things well and other things less well. I am not convinced at all that he’s as good as Cody is or will be as good as Cody will be. But that judgment can’t be made on the basis of a single game. For now, I just wrote down what I saw.

        All Kassian has to do to make this trade acceptable to me right now is to play regular minutes and contribute to this team, either offensively or by providing energy. If he sticks on the second line, plays physical and helps generate offense, that’s great. Actually, if he can do that he will have vastly exceeded my expectations for this year, because to be honest I more or less expect him to be in and out of the 4th line wing spot in the short term. He definitely needs to be a bit more assertive in his physical play than he was yesterday to contribute as the “rumbling bull” Ray Ferraro says he can be. As I said playing with Kesler will help that. Really, what do I want from Kassian? No. Soft. Plays.

        He doesn’t have to be as good as Cody ends up being, provided Graganani also ends up panning out, because it wasn’t just Cody for Zack, it was a trade for two potentially good players with Sulzer as filler. Additionally, if Cody never becomes more than a 20-25 guy then that might dictate who won this too. But I don’t think that’ll happen. No way to tell for 3 years or so.

        VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
        Rating: -3 (from 5 votes)
  17. garth
    February 29, 2012

    Zack “KickKass” Kassian?
    Mama Kass
    Big Mouth Kass
    Zack Karkassian
    Saved by the Bell
    Kass Money
    Tango and Kass
    Kassian Cousins (something about him and Higgins in this)
    Snaggletooth – that’s only going to get better as he loses more chiclets
    Zack Mild/Wild (depending on the night)

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
  18. Chicky
    February 29, 2012

    I was pretty fond of seeing Lappy and the new kid yabbering away at the Yotes bench last night. He’s got a buddy already!

    What about Zach Zach Attack? Hmmmn, needs work.

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +3 (from 3 votes)
  19. Brent
    February 29, 2012

    less offensive than Mr. Dressup – too funny!

    Kassimonster – he is big and scarry with bad teeth Speaking of which, ya wear a mouth guard, don’t confirm you are’t the sharpest pencil in the box.

    I watched the game especially to see how Kassian played. I was pleasantly surprized. Other than him apparently not being in the best shape, he played well and didn’t do anything stupid. So maybe I will have to eat some of my words about how stupid this trade was. But I reserve the right to go ballistic when he gets suspended for 5 games for some stupid hit.

    So any scuttlebutt on if Cody agent was involved in triggering this trade? Cody sure seemed surprized when he was interviewed on TSN, so I assume he had no idea. Or at least no idea he was heading to a bottom feeder team.

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +6 (from 6 votes)
    • peanutflower
      February 29, 2012

      There’s the conundrum for a player, huh? Limited minutes on a really good team or loads of minutes on a crap team. Hmm.

      VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
      Rating: +4 (from 4 votes)
      • tom selleck's moustache
        February 29, 2012

        Having been in both scenarios, I’d take the former.

        VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  20. sarah
    February 29, 2012

    I thought Kassian played well, but I really hope this doesn’t mean Booth will be getting 4th line minutes. I don’t think I can handle reading more stories about a player being in AV’s doghouse. Here’s hoping the AmEx Line gets reunited.

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +3 (from 3 votes)
  21. Trevor
    February 29, 2012

    I THINK EBBETT MIGHT HAVE TIPPED IT!!!!!!

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +9 (from 9 votes)
  22. jimbob
    February 29, 2012

    nicknames take time to develop. just wait until he does something of note and use that. eg. mason “falls down” raymond.
    I missed the first period. i would have loved to see a ‘furious’ tanev.

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +3 (from 3 votes)
  23. Chris
    February 29, 2012

    I’m going to stick with Zack “Stojanov” Kassian myself. You know what this game could’ve used? A blistering slap shot coming down the wing by Cody Hod…oops I forgot. Well at least, when it goes to the shootout, they can rely on Cod…oh, forgot again sorry.

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: -8 (from 12 votes)
    • John Andress
      February 29, 2012

      And here’s a give away right in front of Schneider, Just like Cody Ho…oops I forgot. They say that it takes a full year to get over a breakup. Do you think that we will have to read posts like this from Chris and his ilk for a whole year?

      VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
      Rating: +3 (from 5 votes)
      • stathead
        February 29, 2012

        Yes, we will.

        Zack was good. But I wish I could give advice to a young guy just starting in the NHL. 1) Always listen to your teammates. 2) Only speak in cliches when you’re talking to the media. 3) Dude, wear a mouth guard and fasten your helmet.

        VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
        Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)
  24. curious
    February 29, 2012

    ANGRY CHRIS TANEV, made my day! :)

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +6 (from 6 votes)
    • J21
      February 29, 2012

      Needs to be an Internet meme. Do these work? Let’s find out:

      VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  25. Dougster
    February 29, 2012

    i like the CoHo deal for Kassian–I just hope his nick turns out NOT to be Billy Jackassian..

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +4 (from 4 votes)
  26. walharas88
    February 29, 2012

    Ya you’re right, Cody Hodgson’s experience of 3 whole shootout goals would undoubtedly have won this game…

    I saw on twitter, someone named the fourth line (w/Kassian) the Ma-Ma-Kass line and sad to say that had me chuckling. There are so many options for a nickname for him! And obviously this says a lot about the excitement of this game since so the comments section is mostly nicknames. As for Gragnani, there is a silent G in his name….or is it too soon/mean to do that?

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +1 (from 5 votes)
  27. J21
    February 29, 2012

    “Marco Turco”? :)

    Putting Burrows — the Canucks’ best shooter — in third position continues to be mathematical insanity. You do not “save the best for last” in the shootout, because it is a “best-of” series, and in any best-of series you don’t know that you will make it to the end. This isn’t a question of approach or philosophy — it is an empirical miscalculation, and it annoys me to no end for a franchise that is trying to be scientific in its methods.

    Iain MacIntyre finally mentioned something on Twitter after the game, but I wish more people would. PITB comment enthusiasts know that I’ve been beating this drum for quite some time.

    I agree that Raymond had a good game, even though he’s getting crucified by tunnel-vision fans.

    If only Kassian had gotten that cross-crease pass a little bit up, it would have been a very nice first game story.

    Schneider was simply spectacular all game — I mean, “how can we trade this guy” spectacular — and then there was that one, incredibly ugly rebound. A number of things went wrong on that play, but that was just a big shame when he was otherwise having an unbelievable night.

    My recommended nickname for Kassian would easily have been “Armenian Idol.” But then I read that, in spite of his name, he isn’t of Armenian stock. Weird.

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +4 (from 4 votes)
    • Tom Benjamin
      February 29, 2012

      Putting Burrows — the Canucks’ best shooter — in third position continues to be mathematical insanity. You do not “save the best for last” in the shootout, because it is a “best-of” series, and in any best-of series you don’t know that you will make it to the end. This isn’t a question of approach or philosophy — it is an empirical miscalculation, and it annoys me to no end for a franchise that is trying to be scientific in its methods.

      I thought this for a bit, too, but if you think about it some more, you will realize that it doesn’t matter when Burrows shoots. The Canucks get three shots and the only reason Burrows didn’t shoot is because they had already lost. If he had shot first and scored, the Canucks still lose because the other two Canucks missed and two Coyotes scored.

      As long as you send out your best three shooters it doesn’t matter the order unless you think there is some carryover from shot to shot.

      VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
      Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)
      • Daniel Wagner
        February 29, 2012

        That’s a good point, Tom. It seems the only benefit would be psychological, not necessarily for the players, but for the fans. Losing 2-1 in the shootout is more palatable for fans than losing 2-0.

        VN:F [1.9.16_1159]
        Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)
        • Tom Benjamin
          February 29, 2012

          I’d rather lose 2-0, and save the goal for another shootout. I think that’s the best argument for saving your best for last. Not that Burrows surprises anyone, but I think the more goalies see of a guy, the more likely they are to stop him. If Burrows had beaten Smith in a losing effort last night, Smith is more likely to stop him next time when the game is on the line.

          VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
          Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
          • stathead
            February 29, 2012

            Save a goal for next time? We should ask the NHL if we can start carrying over goals. “Since we lost this one anyways, let’s just call it 2-0 and start our next game against Coyotes 1-0 at the puck drop, OK?”

            VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
            Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
      • J21
        February 29, 2012

        I don’t believe this is correct, is it? (And hasn’t Cam Charron even done the math on it?) I believe in most cases it doesn’t matter, but it can.

        Hm, now I’m trying to envision boxy diagrams in my head showing all possible outcomes.

        VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
        • J21
          February 29, 2012

          From Cam Charron’s analysis (emphasis in original):

          Two pertinent questions were answered here. One is that it doesn’t matter what order you send your top players out, so long as they are in Rounds 1 or 2 and thus guaranteed a shot. The “leverage index”, which calculates the importance of each shot (Round 3 has more leverage on the outcome than Round 1) is always equal to 1 in Round 1, and averages out to 1 in Round 2. Without knowing what the score will be after the first round, you’re pretty much flipping a coin to determine whether you should send your best shooter out first or second.

          http://canucksarmy.com/2012/2/9/qualclutch-applications-the-shootout

          VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
          Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
        • J21
          February 29, 2012

          Did my comment not get posted because I included a link? Here is the excerpt from Cam’s posting, then, with no link — emphasis in original:

          Two pertinent questions were answered here. One is that it doesn’t matter what order you send your top players out, so long as they are in Rounds 1 or 2 and thus guaranteed a shot. The “leverage index”, which calculates the importance of each shot (Round 3 has more leverage on the outcome than Round 1) is always equal to 1 in Round 1, and averages out to 1 in Round 2. Without knowing what the score will be after the first round, you’re pretty much flipping a coin to determine whether you should send your best shooter out first or second.

          VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
          Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
        • Tom Benjamin
          February 29, 2012

          I think Cam is wrong. He does not explain why it is important for the best shooter to shoot in the top two.

          If Burrows is third, the only times he fails to shoot is when the Canucks have already won or already lost. In the first case they didn’t need him and in the second he couldn’t have helped them avoid the loss.

          Having Burrows shoot first or second assures that he will have a chance but that does not give the Canucks an improved chance to win.

          VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
          Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
          • stathead
            February 29, 2012

            I love how this shootout debate is all about shooters failing to score. Not a single “well it wasn’t Raymond’s fault! We can’t win shootouts unless [goaltender] can make more than one stop!” which is all you read anywhere when Luongo has lost.

            VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
            Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
  28. DanD
    February 29, 2012

    I vote for “Kassassin.” It’s pretty catchy. Although I think you guys should keep trying new ones on for size. It’s delightul! Kassian made a really good play in his own zone in the first where he got to the puck first and shielded it with his body from the Coyotes player. He looked really strong there, and he made a nice breakout pass too.

    Also, did anyone else hear some loudmouth fan call someone else a “f***ing dumba**” early in the OT period? I was just innocently watching the game when suddenly my ears were assaulted by a random F-bomber in the crowd. He must have yelled it pretty loud for it to come through so clearly on the broadcast. Maybe he was tired of all the Canucks fans glowing wigs?

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +4 (from 4 votes)
    • peanutflower
      February 29, 2012

      I sure heard that. I rewound it a few times to see if I could figure out where it was coming from. I thought from a player but I never clued in to someone in the crowd. I think there was some kind of microphone down near where another dumbass was pounding on the glass everytime a player came remotely near him. Maybe it was that dumbass.

      VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  29. Dougster
    February 29, 2012

    I think Kibbles would be a good nick… Easy to shout out and there is something about him of the bulldog in the Kibbles n bits commercial. If he is ever on a line with Bitz it will be irresistible!

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +4 (from 6 votes)
  30. cerebral pahlsson
    February 29, 2012

    zach galifiankassian

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
  31. Mcallister
    February 29, 2012

    New drinking game: Take a shot every time Mason Raymond falls down.
    Result: Drunk after the 1st period.

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +11 (from 13 votes)
    • peanutflower
      February 29, 2012

      Every time you see the Canucks equipment guy (forgot his name) working on skates between periods they’re Raymond’s skates. Either he makes it so Raymond falls down more, or Raymond just passes them to him bemusedly and automatically.

      VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • jimbob
      February 29, 2012

      uh oh. this is gonna make my liver hurt.

      VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  32. Gabrielle
    February 29, 2012

    This game was so boring, by the shootout I could barely keep my eyes open.

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  33. David Lindquist
    February 29, 2012

    I love Zack ‘Killer’ Kassian already — I love him so much, I took some time to make a graphical tribute to the Killer

    http://www.davidlindquist.net/killer-kassian.gif

    Feel free to spred this image around

    - D

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  34. Steve
    February 29, 2012

    The Kassianian one.

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)