After a promising playoff debut in 2007, Jannik Hansen couldn’t seem to stay healthy long enough to improve on it. For two seasons, he drifted in and out of the Vancouver lineup, unable to play more than 60 games and failing, in consecutive years, to put together enough quality performances to argue that he was worthy of a long-term investment. This offseason, he only managed to avoid another one-year, two-way contract by taking the team to arbitration, where the award was guaranteed to be one-way. But Hansen still had to settle for a second one year, sub-seven figure deal.

That likely won’t happen a third time. This year, Hansen survived the entire campaign, and his long-awaited breakout season finally took place. Though the offense has yet to arrive (he failed to crack 10 goals for the third straight year), his other contributions were paramount: he led the team in hits, was first among wingers in takeaways, and became a staple on the Canucks’ third line and penalty kill. For his tireless work, he was named the team’s regular season “Unsung Hero”.

There appears to be no threat of a postseason regression, either, as Hansen put in a stellar performance in last night’s playoff opener. He was all over the ice, earning second star honours after registering four shots, five hits, and a breakaway goal (above). Unsurprisingly, it would appear his tight-checking, detail-oriented, defense-first game is tailor-made for the postseason.

Unfortunately, it’s also tailor-made to get noticed in the postseason, and Hansen is a restricted free agent.

The game changes in the postseason, and so do the things that get a guy recognized. Simply scoring a lot will earn one regular season fame, but in the postseason, one-way play is a one-way ticket to infamy. Playoff hockey is made for the two-way guys–guys like Jannik Hansen that play hard-nosed, tight, defensive hockey night in and night out. Suddenly, their inability to play pretty hardly matters. Nothing’s pretty in the playoffs. These guys just get it done.

A strong postseason outing from a depth guy means a prestige boost that can change the direction of his entire career. In previous years, guys like Sami Pahlsson, Maxime Talbot, Dave Bolland, Travis Moen, and Rob Neidermayer skyrocketed to fame following standout postseason performances as shutdown players or depth scorers when their star teammates got the shutdown treatment. Hansen appears poised to see a similar rise in notoriety.

None of this will surprise the Canucks. They’ve known for some time what they had  in Hansen, but his bad luck and spotty play has worked to their advantage. He  hasn’t had the stats to make much of an argument, and he couldn’t count on an offer sheet from another team; no one knew who he was. In truth, if he didn’t accept the flimsy deals offered him, he might have had to say goodbye to the NHL, and the Canucks knew it, so they hardly budged.

After two years of effectively having their way with him, the Canucks will likely be surprised at Hansen’s bargaining power this time around, especially if the team goes deep into the playoffs. If his play in Game 1 is any indication of what we can expect from him during an extended run, Hansen’s value is about to skyrocket. When that happens, the Canucks might have to try a little harder to keep him.

The passive approach to negotiations won’t work this offseason. Jannik Hansen will be a household name by the time the playoffs are over.

Tags: , , , ,

11 comments

  1. chicken hawk
    April 14, 2011

    just a reminder i once wrote:

    On Missing Manny ( A Prophecy )

    do not improperly panic
    or be so borderline manic
    for you’ve still players like Jannik

    notwithstanding what Manny was
    you still can win the cup because
    players will play as Hansen does

    I’m just saying they will not quit
    given Malhotra’s out of it
    they’ll gird their loins and show his grit

    the Stanley Cup your team will own
    as Jannik Hansen sets the tone

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  2. chicken hawk
    April 14, 2011

    actually chicken chick wrote that, much to my disappointment!

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  3. beninvictoria
    April 14, 2011

    damn, i thought maybe the poetic bird family hadn’t survived the migration….
    get it?

    Hopefully Jannik doesnt ask for too much, I like him a lot. He’s as dependable as Alex Burrows and he just might be the best penalty killer in the league.

    VN:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  4. Grant McMillan
    April 14, 2011

    So what you’re saying, Harrison, is that the Canucks will be the Blackhawks of last year – unable to keep their team together because of salary cap issues?

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  5. Nat
    April 14, 2011

    “Jannik Hansen will be a household name by the time the playoffs are over. ” Didn’t you say in the previous post that we shouldn’t get cocky?
    But I agree, this guy is great…he’s a tenacious checker, defensively sound, and committed player….the type of play that, if we go far, will make a huge difference for us.

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  6. kenblankenship
    April 14, 2011

    If somebody has to go it won’t be Hansen. Bye bye mr lameo raymo

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  7. Human Cannonball
    April 14, 2011

    Chicken Hawk:

    When the Hawks the ‘Nucks remove
    From the playoffs as they prove
    That their season wasn’t chance
    Like the Hawks’ eighth place advance

    Will you stop and eat some crow,
    put aside this silly row,
    Join the victors in their cheers,
    After drought of forty years?

    Though I cannot speak for all
    While the ‘Nucks make the long haul
    Vancouver would be rosy
    To have you write us poesy.

    VN:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  8. chicken hawk
    April 15, 2011

    AH, shucks!

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  9. Steve
    April 15, 2011

    Hate to be a huge dork here but the phrase that this article’s title is riffing on is “He’s so gonna get laid” not “He’s gonna get so laid”.

    VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Harrison Mooney
      April 15, 2011

      Fortunately, Steve, I’m not riffing on anything. I actually talk this way.

      VN:F [1.9.16_1159]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
      • Steve
        April 15, 2011

        Oh, carry on then. Love the new corner image.

        VA:F [1.9.16_1159]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)